Essays on capital punishment usually contain the following points: Reasons of contradictors of capital punishment. 1. Judicial errors. Nobody has yet managed to produce a juridical service that operates with no errors. And this, in case capital punishment is administered, implies that unguilty individuals will unavoidably be put to death · The opposing argument, therefore, is that an individual who commits murder is aware of their wrong doing and is forfeiting their right to life. An extremely common case against capital punishment is that there will inevitably be errors within the justice system that result in innocent people being put to blogger.comted Reading Time: 11 mins · Essay Against Capital Punishment. 23 Mar, Free Samples 0. In this country, The Death Penalty is used to punish some of the worst criminals. The country decides to take their lives for the crimes they have committed, The Death Penalty, also known as Capital Punishment, has been used ever since B.C. This means that thousands have died, brutally, for what they have done and yet
Essay Against Capital Punishment - Examples & Papers
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it. Type of paper: Argumentative Essay.
Topic: CrimePunishmentCriminal JusticeDeathCapital PunishmentLifeFinanceSocial Issues. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, refers to the legal process that result to a felon who commits heinous crimes being sentenced to death by the state judicial authorities to pay for the wrongdoings that are otherwise considered extreme.
The actual act of killing the individual is called execution, while the judicial decree that allows for the individual to be punished this way is called the death sentence. Capital punishment has existed in nearly all societies since time immemorial, whereby it served to punish perpetrators of serious crimes and those who revolted against the authorities. In the contemporary world, most societies that still use Capital Punishment reserve it for crimes such as treason, espionage and murder.
During the past, especially the dark ages, sodomy, rape, adultery and incest were considered serious offences and carried the death penalty. Brutal ways were used to end the lives of those sentenced to death and these included: boiling the criminal alive essay against capital punishment a large cauldron filled with either oil or water, burying alive, beheading using the guillotine, burning the offenders while they were alive and crucifixion just to mention a few.
In this modern day, such crude methods are no longer applied. Historically, Australia featured relentlessly, as far as capital punishment is concerned. Currently, capital punishment essay against capital punishment not allowed in the Nation. The last time for a man to face a hangman was in the year Even before the execution, various states had long abolished capital punishment. Most of crimes that were previously subject to capital punishment are now treated with sentences to life imprisonment.
Nevertheless, the use of Capital Punishment remains one of the most debatable subjects with proponents citing solid arguments for its use, while opponents similarly postulate solid arguments against this type of punishment, essay against capital punishment. The paper will dwell on arguments for and against Capital Punishment.
First, opponents cite that human life is valuable and authorities that are run by humans do not have the right to sentence fellow humans to death even in cases where they have performed the most heinous crimes.
Secondly opponents argue that every human being has an alienable essay against capital punishment to life. Sentencing a essay against capital punishment to death even if he or she has committed murder violates the God given right to life of that person Goldstein, ; This argument closely resembles the first one but it is argued from the perspective of human right groups.
Based on human rights perspective, every human being is entitled to fundamental privileges such as right to life, and that administering capital punishment amounts to worst human rights violation, essay against capital punishment.
This is because the right to life is the most fundamental BBC, Thirdly, abolitionists insist that retribution is nothing other than revenge, which should not be condoned. To the abolitions, two wrongs in retributions do not necessarily add to a right.
Additionally, essay against capital punishment, according to abolitionists, essay against capital punishment, capital punishment may entail wrongful execution, which would see innocently convicted people executed, essay against capital punishment.
They have often given the example that, in 25 states, between andas significant as were relieved from death row when courts declared them innocent Rita, ; As if not enough, abolitionists argue that capital punishment is likely to be a subject of disproportionate minority representations based on element such as race, gender and economic status. They argue that, for instance, the fact that African Americans account for only 12 percent of the total population have constituted 41 percent of death row inmates and have constituted 34 percent of the number of people executed since However, there are convincing reasons why capital punishment should be allowed.
First, on the basis of retribution, capital punishment is morally justified when applied to crimes entailing murder, especially with elements of aggravation such as multiple homicide, torture murder and child murder, as well as mass killing incidents such as genocide or terrorism.
Gertrude contends that failing to administer capital punishment penalty in such cases is what may be particularly unjust. In order to ensure fairness, the punishment must be as painful as proportional to the crime, essay against capital punishment.
It would be unjustified to let heinous crime offender live, leave alone incarcerating them. Secondly, capital punishment is necessary because it deters crimes. It is arguable that the best way to deal with crimes is prevent their occurrence, and this is achievable through deterrence. Indeed, various groups have inclined on the perspectives that the best appropriate punishment is that which deters further criminal activities. For instance, a terrorist who watches an ally being hanged learns a lesson; hence desists from committing the heinous crime, essay against capital punishment.
It is argued that for every execution, as significant as five lives are saved, indicating that execution correlates negatively with crime deterrence, that is as more offenders are executed, lesser heinous crimes are reported.
Death penalties had deterrent effects in the countries that executed more than nine people as from to implying that deterrence does not come with a few execution programs Shepherd, ; 8. In this regard, there is even the need to increase the number of execution to achieve desirable results.
Thirdly, death penalty should be enforced even if the deterrent effects are uncertain to avoid a repeat of crimes by the same criminals. If societies execute serious crime offender such as murderers, and there happens that deterrent effects are non-existent, the fact remains that the society would have avoided additional murder cases committed by the very criminals Bazemore, ; Additionally, capital punishment could serve as an effective prosecution tool. The threat of death compels defendants to enter the deals of pleas for life without paroles or life with a essay against capital punishment of 30 years.
Prosecutors, courts and complainants may decide to spare criminals from execution in exchange for cooperation with the police in searching for still missing persons Kronenwetter, ; 9.
In addition, it is cheaper to sentence criminals to capital punishment than keeping them in essay against capital punishment. Funds allocated for maintaining the convicts could be allocated for other purposes such as helping the needy. In conclusion, it is worth siding with the view that capital punishment is justified.
What is particularly appealing about capital punishment is that it is justified based on the principle of retribution. There can be no means of serving justice other than based on the retribution. For instance, a man who steals a car should be asked to pay back the car. Undoubtedly, it would be unfair to have the thief of the car punished with a fine of twenty dollars.
In the same way, those who murder should be murdered. Those who kill other by the gun should be shot using the same gun. This should also be applicable for other types of crimes. Besides, it also agreeable that capital punishment is morally justified when applied for crimes entailing murder, especially with elements of aggravation such as multiple homicides, torture murder and child murder, as well as mass killing incidents such as genocide or terrorism.
It also deters crimes, considering that the criminals weigh the consequences of crimes. Thirdly, it prevents additional losses of lives, such as through murder by the same criminals. Bazemore, essay against capital punishment, G. Restorative community justice: repairing harm and transforming communities.
Cincinnati, US: Anderson Publishing. Arguments against capital punishment. Ethics Guide. shtml Gertrude, E. Philosophical Perspectives of Punishment.
Albany: University of New York. Goldstein, W. Defending the human spirits: Jewish law's vision for moral societies. New Delhi: Feldheim Publishers. Kronenwetter, M. Capital Punishment: A Reference Handbook. Phil, B. Phil for Humanity: The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment. html Rita, S. A comparative analyses of capital punishments: statute, policy, frequency, and public attitude the world over Capital punishment.
Lexington Books. Shepherd, J. A Testimony to the Judiciary The Committee, Subcommittee on Crime, Congress, and Homeland Security. We accept sample papers from students via the submission form. If this essay belongs to you and you no longer want us to display it, you can put a claim on it and we will remove it. Just fill out the removal request form with all necessary details, such as page location and some verification of you being a true owner.
Please note that we cannot guarantee that unsubstantiated claims will be satisfied. Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance. ID Subscribe to WowEssays Premium and get access to over 1 MILLION high-quality downloadable samples.
GET ACCESS NOW, essay against capital punishment. Password recovery email has been sent to email email. HIRE WRITER PREMIUM DATABASE Sign in.
HIRE WRITER PREMIUM DATABASE. Type of Paper. Essay Topics. Educational Tools. Who We Are Contact Us Our Writers Honor Code WowEssays Reviews Blog Our Services. ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS. Premium samples database Get access to over 1 MILLION samples with WowEssays Premium! LEARN MORE, essay against capital punishment.
Should Capital Punishment be allowed?
Solved IELTS Essay - Is Capital Punishment useful? - IELTS Band 9
, time: 7:33Capital Punishment Argumentative Essays | WOW Essays
Essay About Capital Punishment. Capital punishment is a death penalty that is put into impact for significant wrongdoings. Capital punishment is an exceptionally dubious theme in the Country and all through the world. The United States has been divided by the death penalty debate, there are many supporters, however; there are also many who opposes it Essays on capital punishment usually contain the following points: Reasons of contradictors of capital punishment. 1. Judicial errors. Nobody has yet managed to produce a juridical service that operates with no errors. And this, in case capital punishment is administered, implies that unguilty individuals will unavoidably be put to death · The paper will dwell on arguments for and against Capital Punishment. First, opponents cite that human life is valuable and authorities that are run by humans do not have the right to sentence fellow humans to death even in cases where they have performed the most heinous blogger.comted Reading Time: 8 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment