Same Sex Marriages essay. Free Essays, Marriage. The issue of gay marriages in the United States continues to be a source of an epic war of words between the conservatives and the liberals. Arguments of all manners have been brought forth with those strongly opposing the civil unions claiming they go against the natural laws and God’s blogger.comted Reading Time: 7 mins · 11/8/06 Argument Essay Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Match for Society Marriage, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is “the legal relationship into which a man and a woman enter with purpose of making a home and raising a family” ().Although most people in the United States, including myself, agree on that definition, there are a select few who do not · January 15, by Karan Kapoor. Essay on Same Sex Marriage: With changing times, the definition of the institution of marriage has taken an altered meaning. When a person marries another person from the same sex, it is called same-sex marriage. People have all rights to love and marry people irrespective of their blogger.comted Reading Time: 5 mins
Same Sex Marriages essay Essay — Free college essays
The issue of gay marriages in the United States continues to be a source of an epic war of words between the conservatives and the liberals. Those that vehemently support gay marriages maintain it is their constitutional right. This controversy is unlikely to end any time soon with the church voicing its strong authoritative opinion into the matter. It is in that light that David B, essays on same sex marriage. and Jonathan R.
This paper shall provide a detailed analysis of the article, examining its proposal to have essays on same sex marriage congress passing a bill on federal civil unions. The authors are convinced that a federal recognition of gay marriages through the congress is the only way that the issue stands to be settled once and for all. They believe that in such recognition, the federal laws should not compel the religious organizations to accept or sanction same sex marriages; this hence will strike a compromise between the same-sex marriage rights activists and the religious organizations, while conferring the various rights and benefits of marriage to the gay community.
In a clear analysis of the situation at hand and in clear recognition of the raging opinions, the article vividly outlines the sentiments that have been echoed, capturing the reservations held by each group. The article notes that any decision made on whether to decriminalize or criminalize same-sex marriages is likely to run into a conflict due to the dialectically opposing opinions held by the parties involved. It observes how the same sex marriages have been widely criticized by religious organizations.
The first amendment confers religious organizations the freedom to carry out their duties in accordance to their beliefs unencumbered by the law. The law cannot coerce the religious organizations to sanction same sex marriages. On the other hand, the article recognizes same sex marriage activists concerns. The position held by gays is that the current stand by the law and the religious organizations is discriminatory in nature.
It is in this atmosphere that they are seeking protections from the law in regard to civil unions. This is being compounded not only by the raging opposition from religious organizations but also by the current Marriage Act which defines marriage as a consensual union between a man and a woman.
It is in the understanding of these underlying factors that David and Jonathan propose the striking of a compromise to reconcile extreme stands held by the gay rights activists and the religious conservatives.
Such a compromise is also necessitated by the fact that past and present opinion polls point to the reluctance by many Americans to accept the legalization of same sex marriages.
This ensures that the provisions of the First Amendment in regard to religious freedom are upheld and also in the same breath granting gays, the many benefits and rights enjoyed by the heterosexual partners. This, the article concludes, remains the perfect way to reconcile both extremes. Indeed as the title of the article has appropriately captured, A Reconciliation on Gay Marriage, the authors have attempted to weigh in on the opinions of both sides in reaching their opinions, essays on same sex marriage.
The gays and the religious organizations are voicing their genuine concerns. To give credence to the debate and indicate that indeed gays deserve what they are asking for, essays on same sex marriage, the article compares the current debate, though in passing, to the abortion topic. Essays on same sex marriage is important to mention that abortion was legalized at a time when it was receiving immense opposition from religious organizations. Notable though, is that the authors despite the bias towards the gays, have been able to present a balanced view of both sides and reach a conclusion adorned with a reconciliatory tone.
The article however has also used persuasive language but has failed to back some of the various claims with statistical evidence. The rest of the article uses quantifying words like many and most without statistical support. The authors too throughout the article have made essays on same sex marriage number of assumptions.
The article purports to reconcile between the gays and the religious organizations views based on an assumption that it is only the religious organizations that are against same sex marriages. It fails to identify other stakeholders such as the politicians and the general public not affiliated to the religious organizations, essays on same sex marriage.
Indeed as reiterated above, the issue of same sex marriage and the acceptance by religious organizations is a stormy debate. I would wish to state however that like the many issues that have before been deemed controversial and divisive, it has to be brought to an end.
The decision to be made and should recognize the fact that times have changed and same sex marriages have to be accepted. I have lauded the paper for emphasizing on gay rights and also for recognizing their fundamental needs.
This is in the probable knowledge that the issue has essays on same sex marriage debated for long and is also in the cognizance of the fact that it has to reach a conclusive end. The public has eventually come to accept gays and lesbians as normal people and accorded them their dues, essays on same sex marriage. Cases of sexual discrimination have also been taken up by the courts which have affirmed that indeed homosexuals have their rights.
I concur with the articles views on the denial of same sex marriage rights as a form of discrimination and also recognize the diverse views on the subject. The passage of a federal law on civil union remains the only way that will accord the gays their rights and also be mindful of the views held by some religious organizations.
Reference David B, essays on same sex marriage. February 21, A Reconciliation on Gay Marriage. New York Times Company. Skip to content Home Free Essays Same Sex Marriages essay. Related essays: Homosexuality and Nurture essay Perspective in society essay Should Men and Women Marry? essay Same-Sex Marriages Should Not Be Legalized essay.
Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 12: \
, time: 55:11Same Sex Marriage Essay for Students in English [Easy Words]
· January 15, by Karan Kapoor. Essay on Same Sex Marriage: With changing times, the definition of the institution of marriage has taken an altered meaning. When a person marries another person from the same sex, it is called same-sex marriage. People have all rights to love and marry people irrespective of their blogger.comted Reading Time: 5 mins · Same sex marriage allows two people in love to happily live together. Homosexuals deserve to be in love just like heterosexuals. The definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes. Paragraph 3: Same sex marriage gives homosexual couples the right to start families · + Words Essay on Same Sex Marriage. Love comes in all forms. It would be wrong to say that a person cannot marry someone just because they are not from the opposite sex. The world is evolving more than ever and we need to keep up with times. Same-sex marriage is when any person chooses to marry the same sex instead of the blogger.comted Reading Time: 3 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment